Office: Building 90, Room 92H
Office Phone: 725-0110
Office Hours: 2-6 W, 4-6 R, and by appointment
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org (or email@example.com, which forwards to my wisc.edu account)
We will be using the following materials for the course (in chronological order):
All of these items are currently available from the Stanford Bookstore. Copies of each are also on reserve at the Tanner Library in the Philosophy Department (Building 90).
Occasionally, I will supplement the readings with my own handouts (mainly, for the purpose of distributing paper topics, lecture notes, etc.). I will usually distribute paper copies of these handouts to the class. Moreover, electronic versions of the handouts will always be posted on the class website:
Handouts will typically be posted in Adobe Acrobat PDF format, and will require Adobe's Acrobat Reader software (version 3.01 or later) to be viewed, printed, etc.
Whenever possible, I will try to disseminate important course information and updates both in class and via email (I'm setting up a course email list this week). So, please check your email regularly.
The course website will also contain lots of other useful information relevant to the course. In particular, the course schedule page, at:
will allow you to keep track of where we are in the course. Current readings, paper topics, paper deadlines, lecture notes, etc. will all be detailed chronologically on this page. You'll notice that the schedule does not extend very far into the future. This is because I like the course to evolve dynamically throughout the quarter. Typically, I will have things like readings and lectures figured out about two weeks in advance. This allows me to make changes to the course in ``real-time,'' as the quarter progresses.
I urge you to explore the course website. Many interesting links & materials can be found there.
Philosophy 164/264 consists of two afternoon ``power lectures'' [2:15-3:30 pm TR @ Building 200, room 303 (***NEW LOCATION AS OF 10/2***)]. Attendance will not figure (explicitly) into your final grade. However, much of the material covered in lecture will not overlap (in any obvious way) with the readings. So, I assume everyone will attend lectures regularly. The objectives of this course are (i) to become familiar with some of the central issues in contemporary philosophy of science (in particular, issues surrounding confirmation and explanation), and (ii) to get some practice at writing concise, analytical papers about some of these issues. As will soon become clear, the course will be taught from a highly analytical and critical perspective with much emphasis on the logical structure of issues, arguments, and accounts.
We will have (i) two short paper assignments, and (ii) a take-home final examination (essentially, a third short paper). The first short paper will be worth 25% of your final grade, the second paper will be worth 35% of your final grade, and the take-home final examination will be worth 40% of your final grade.
Roughly every two weeks (starting today!), I will distribute ``short paper topics.'' Usually, these will be questions and issues that I formulate on my analysis of the readings for that ``fortnight'' of the course. Sometimes, the topics will be drawn from other sources. Your short papers may be discussions of one (or more) of these topics. Or, you may choose your own paper topics (but, please discuss your topics with me first!). You will notice that the topics I distribute are very focused and somewhat narrow. This is intentional. What I'm looking for are concise, precise, and analytical papers. In particular, I'd like the papers (including the take-home final!) to be no more than 4,000 words in length (and, if possible, between 2,000 and 3,000 words). The papers should contain a minimum of window dressing. They should quickly set up the issue/problem, and then (straightaway!) propose a brief and precise analysis/resolution of it. I will meet with each student to discuss their paper topics and papers, and I will allow (and encourage) resubmissions of papers, if this might be beneficial (except for the final!). I will try to provide some examples of ``model papers'' to give you an idea of the kind of thing I'm looking for. As a rough guideline, you might want to pick up a recent issue of the journal ANALYSIS. These are the sorts of papers (in terms of structure, style, and length) that I have in mind. Tentatively, our due dates for the papers and the take-home final are: